🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."